Tagged: Marketing

Take your library users beyond Google to trustworthy scholarly resources

Facet Publishing have announced the release of the second edition of Marketing Your Library’s Electronic Resources by Marie R. Kennedy and Cheryl LaGuardia.


As every frontline librarian knows, if library users really knew and understood how many resources are made available to them online, they wouldn’t go to alternative information providers to do their research. Online library systems don’t make e-resources very accessible nor does simply making users aware of resources solve the problem given the number of resources available so getting the word out effectively means creating strategic marketing programmes.

Newly expanded and updated, the second edition of Marketing Your Library’s Electronic Resources demonstrates how to design and implement marketing plans that will help librarians save time, effort, and money while increasing the use of library e-resources. The book includes guides to writing, implementing, assessing, and updating library marketing plans and features case studies from seven academic and public libraries

The authors said,

“Libraries are acquiring enormously valuable and significantly expensive electronic databases for researchers, but those researchers may not even be aware of them. Marketing Your Library’s Electronic Resources aims to bridge the awareness gap between the library and its user, taking them well beyond the limitations of Google to the heady delights of trustworthy, vetted scholarly resources.”

Marie R. Kennedy is a librarian at Loyola Marymount University, where she coordinates serials and electronic resources. She has written and presented widely on the development and use of electronic resource management systems. Marie also writes the Organization Monkey blog about organization and librarianship. She is the co-director of the Institute for Research Design in Librarianship (http://irdlonline.org).

Cheryl LaGuardia
is a research librarian at Widener Library, Harvard University. She writes the Not Dead Yet blog and eReviews for Library Journal, edits the library selection tool, Magazines For Libraries™ and writes the Magazines For Libraries™ Update blog, and has published a number of books, including Becoming a Library Teacher; Finding Common Ground: Creating the Library of the Future without Diminishing the Library of the Past; and Teaching the New Library. She received the Isadore Gilbert Mudge Award from the American Library Association in 2016.



Marketing Your Library’s Electronic Resources

The following is an extract from Marketing Your Library’s Electronic Resources: A how-to-do-it manual by Marie R Kennedy and Cheryl LaGuardia.


Image source: flickr cc pic by 416style

The Library Marketing Mantra

It’s actually becoming almost a mantra that libraries need to market themselves and their products (services and collections) better, because:

(a) we’re in an economic climate in which every penny needs to be justified

(b) along with justifying the need for resources to get them in the first place, there is a heightened expectation among those funding libraries (colleges and universities, towns and cities, businesses) that they will see a palpable return on that investment (ROI; more on this later)

(c) competition with information-fulfillment systems outside libraries is increasing, although the competition may not actually be offering products that are anywhere as good as those of libraries.

We perceive a considerable need among researchers for greater knowledge about library e-resources. Based on that need, we librarians must make it our business to market our e-resources to patrons (rather than just add new e-resources to our web portals and hope for the best). “If we build it [subscribe to it] they will come” may have worked for a baseball field in Iowa (Gordon and Gordon, 1989), but it is not a successful marketing strategy for library e-resources.

ROI versus Value

ROI has, unfortunately, been a library buzz-acronym in the recent past. We say “unfortunately” because it automatically places a business construct on institutions that are inherently not businesses, but service organizations (that is, libraries). An Internet search of the term returns results that are distinctly focused on a business model. If you’d like to read more about how ROI relates to library impact/valuations, check out the ALA online bibliography, Articles and Studies Related to Library Value (Return on Investment).

Literal ROI studies don’t make a lot of sense to us because those measures are based on corporate production values alien to a library’s mission of service. However, qualitative measures of a library’s impact make a ton of sense, and we strongly support Jim Neal’s arguments in his ACRL paper Stop the Madness: The Insanity of ROI and the Need for New Qualitative Measures of Academic Library Success (Neal, 2011). We reaffirm Neal’s thesis that the

academic library needs to be present to anyone, anywhere, anytime, and anyhow,

although we feel his statement can apply more broadly to all libraries (Neal, 2011: 425). In his paper he argues that libraries and librarians must be more entrepreneurial, and in that process, we need to:

ask ourselves fundamental questions. Can we offer additional information or transaction services to our existing customer base? Can we address the needs of new customer segments by repackaging our current information assets or by creating new business capabilities through the Internet? Can we use our ability to attract customers to generate new sources of revenue? Will our business be significantly harmed by other companies providing some of the same value we currently offer? How do we become a customer magnet through electronic commerce? How do we build direct links to new customers? How do we take away bits of value digitally from other companies? Can we use the Internet as both a tool for global learning and scholarly communication and for technology transfer and entrepreneurial activities? (Neal, 2011: 428)

If you examine all of Neal’s questions, you’ll note that every one of them intimately relates to library electronic resources—their selection, acquisition, accessibility, and ubiquity. We believe the libraries that are able to answer Neal’s questions informedly, based on their users’ needs and expectations, are the libraries that will thrive in the “mutable future” Neal foresees.

Image This is an extract from the first chapter of Marketing Your Library’s Electronic Resources: A how-to-do-it manual by Marie R Kennedy and Cheryl LaGuardia.

Find out more information and purchase the book here.